<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ColdFusion 9 : Implicit/Generated CFC Methods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rupeshk.org/blog/index.php/2009/07/coldfusion-9-implicitgenerated-cfc-methods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rupeshk.org/blog/index.php/2009/07/coldfusion-9-implicitgenerated-cfc-methods/</link>
	<description>My Views on ColdFusion, Java and related technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:26:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rupesh Kumar</title>
		<link>http://www.rupeshk.org/blog/index.php/2009/07/coldfusion-9-implicitgenerated-cfc-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupesh Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rupeshk.org/blog/index.php/2009/07/coldfusion-9-implicitgenerated-cfc-methods/#comment-428</guid>
		<description>tag or script are just two different styles of writing CFCs. They dont affect the features of CFC at all. Implicit/Generated CFC methods are features of CFC and will work no matter which style you write the CFC in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tag or script are just two different styles of writing CFCs. They dont affect the features of CFC at all. Implicit/Generated CFC methods are features of CFC and will work no matter which style you write the CFC in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rupesh Kumar</title>
		<link>http://www.rupeshk.org/blog/index.php/2009/07/coldfusion-9-implicitgenerated-cfc-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupesh Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rupeshk.org/blog/index.php/2009/07/coldfusion-9-implicitgenerated-cfc-methods/#comment-427</guid>
		<description>Currently its exactly same as cfparam validation. So the only way is to wrap it in try/catch. But yes, if you want it handled differently, why don&#039;t you log an enhancement request mentioning how you would like to be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently its exactly same as cfparam validation. So the only way is to wrap it in try/catch. But yes, if you want it handled differently, why don&#8217;t you log an enhancement request mentioning how you would like to be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.rupeshk.org/blog/index.php/2009/07/coldfusion-9-implicitgenerated-cfc-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rupeshk.org/blog/index.php/2009/07/coldfusion-9-implicitgenerated-cfc-methods/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Are Implicit/Generated CFC Methods only for new style cfscript cfc&#039;s or will they also be generated for old style tag based cfc&#039;s? I would think that they are for both, but I have not seen a single mention of it being available for tag based cfc&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are Implicit/Generated CFC Methods only for new style cfscript cfc&#8217;s or will they also be generated for old style tag based cfc&#8217;s? I would think that they are for both, but I have not seen a single mention of it being available for tag based cfc&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Farmer</title>
		<link>http://www.rupeshk.org/blog/index.php/2009/07/coldfusion-9-implicitgenerated-cfc-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Farmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rupeshk.org/blog/index.php/2009/07/coldfusion-9-implicitgenerated-cfc-methods/#comment-402</guid>
		<description>Very cool stuff.

Regrading the validation, is there anyway to get back what failed the validation other than by wrapping it in try/catch?  A validate function or something similar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool stuff.</p>
<p>Regrading the validation, is there anyway to get back what failed the validation other than by wrapping it in try/catch?  A validate function or something similar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Ho</title>
		<link>http://www.rupeshk.org/blog/index.php/2009/07/coldfusion-9-implicitgenerated-cfc-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Ho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rupeshk.org/blog/index.php/2009/07/coldfusion-9-implicitgenerated-cfc-methods/#comment-401</guid>
		<description>&quot;I am sure writing accessors for your CFC fields will become a thing of past...&quot; when we don&#039;t have to code for CF7 and 8... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am sure writing accessors for your CFC fields will become a thing of past&#8230;&#8221; when we don&#8217;t have to code for CF7 and 8&#8230; <img src='http://www.rupeshk.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
